titularidad sindical
English translation: union entitlement
| 23:07 Oct 30, 2019 |
| Spanish to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Law: Contract(s) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Daniel Coria Argentina Local time: 12:25 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | union entitlement |
| ||
| 2 +1 | union ownership |
|
| Discussion entries: 2 | |
|---|---|
Answers
44 mins confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1union ownership Explanation: Morales & Besa Talks: On labor reform and ... - Morales & Besa moralesybesa.cl › eng › morales-besa-talks-on-labor-reform-and-challenge... Sep 22, 2016 - Fernando Arab, Labor partner at Morales & Besa, led an analysis and conversation in ... Lack of ***union ownership*** and subsistence of negotiating groups. ... Updated pre-merger control thresholds came into effect today in Chile. union ownership -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 52 mins (2019-10-30 23:59:56 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Workers, organized labor organization CUT (Central Unitaria de Trabajadores) take part in a rally to mark May Day, International Workers' Day in Santiago, Chile on May 01, 2016. As is tradition in Santiago , the CUT called for a march to commemorate the date that is crossed by the **rejection of the Constitutional Court to union ownership***, considered the heart of the labor reform. https://www.gettyimages.co.nz/detail/news-photo/workers-orga... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 3 hrs (2019-11-01 02:46:58 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- This is in English: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chile-reform-labor-idUSKC... SANTIAGO (Reuters) - A top court ruled on Wednesday that key provisions of Chilean President Michelle Bachelet’s landmark labor reform were unconstitutional, invalidating parts of the legislation just weeks before it was due to take effect. In a 6-4 decision, the Tribunal rejected as unconstitutional a provision that said companies could only negotiate with legally designated unions during collective wage talks. It also rejected part of a measure that prohibited companies from extending benefits resulting from bargaining agreements to non-unionized employees. “For more than a year and a half we told the government, in all manner of ways, that their intention of giving unions a monopoly and obligating workers to join a union in order to get the benefits (that are negotiated) was unjust and unconstitutional,” said opposition Senator Andres Allamand. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 4 hrs (2019-11-01 03:21:53 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The ILO translates it as follows: Artículos 1 a 6 del Convenio. Reforma laboral. La Comisión toma nota de la adopción de la ley núm. 20940 (moderniza el sistema de relaciones laborales) que entrará en vigor el 1.º de abril de 2017. La Comisión toma nota de que el Gobierno precisa que: i) en el proceso de tramitación de la ley se consultó con un amplio número de interlocutores sociales; ii) se tomaron en consideración los comentarios anteriores de la Comisión y aportes técnicos de la Oficina; iii) algunas disposiciones del proyecto de ley fueron sometidas al Tribunal Constitucional por senadores y diputados detractores de las mismas y el fallo acogió parcialmente su requerimiento, eliminando en particular las normas relativas a la titularidad sindical, y iv) el Gobierno tuvo que introducir modificaciones adicionales al proyecto debido a los desequilibrios introducidos con la supresión de la titularidad sindical. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:13100:0::N... https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:13100:0::NO::P13... Articles 1–6 of the Convention. Labour reform. The Committee notes the adoption of Act No. 20.940, modernizing the industrial relations system, which will enter into force on 1 April 2017. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that: (i) consultations were held with a large number of social partners during the process of adoption of the Act; (ii) the previous comments of the Committee and technical support of the Office were taken into consideration; (iii) certain provisions of the Bill by senators and deputies who opposed them were submitted to the Constitutional Court, and the ruling partially upheld their challenge, particularly by eliminating the provisions on the recognition of ***trade unions for collective bargaining purposes****; and (iv) the Government had to make additional amendments to the Bill due to the imbalances introduced through the elimination of the provisions on the recognition of trade unions for collective bargaining purposes. ***trade unions for collective bargaining purposes**** |
| ||||||||||||||||
1 day 20 hrs confidence:
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question. You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. KudoZ™ translation helpThe KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also: Search millions of term translations Your current localization setting
English
Select a language Close search
| |||||||||||||||||
