What's so bad about being a purist? 10:26 Jan 13, 2018
It rather denotes quality. I strongly condemn today's majority of people, who just go with the flow, because they just rush, cut corners, are too lazy to do a quality job and too cowardly to stand up for quality as opposed to speed. Their work to me is not work at all. It's garbage. It has no value. I always try to do quality work in everything, I do. So being termed a purist is fine with me. I'm proud of it.<br> But posting your answer as a discussion entry poses a problem for me, because your answer was better, than the one below, which was posted as an answer, but I can't grade yours this way. And if by low hanging fruit you mean an easy job, I don't understand, why you don't want to take credit for it, because to me this question wasn't easy at all and a good explanation is hard to come by. I have learned only from YOUR answer, which way of writing is the original one, the older one. I didn't learn it from the answer posted below. So what's too easy for you, is difficult for others. And it will always be easier for a native speaker, but it's also the way, you explain (or you don't, or you don't care), what adds value to your answer. So now it's hard for me to grade it. |