succeed the company
Indonesian translation: meneruskan kepemilikan
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 04:17 Jul 19, 2019 |
|
| English to Indonesian translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Business/Commerce (general) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: ErichEko ⟹⭐ Indonesia Local time: 20:26 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 +1 | penerus perusahaan ini nantinya |
| ||
| 5 | meneruskan kepemilikan perusahaan |
| ||
| 4 +1 | mewarisi perusahaan |
|
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Revised English |
|
Answers
1 hr confidence: 
meneruskan kepemilikan perusahaan Explanation: Makna yang bertalian dari Lexico (produk Oxford): succeed 2.1 no object Become the new rightful holder of an office, title, or property. Sebenarnya, kalimat di atas kurang kata depan. Seharusnya: to succeed to the company. karena succeed di sini adalah kata kerja intransitif. 💼 Terjemahan juga dapat [dan memang sebaiknya] diluweskan mengikuti konteks sebelum dan/atau sesudah, semisal: meneruskan kepemimpinan perusahaan. Ini karena sudah lazim bahwa pemilik [utama] perusahaan akan menjadi pemimpinnya (sebagai CEO, direktur, komisaris, dsb.) |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
1 day 7 hrs confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1mewarisi perusahaan Explanation: Ini hanya terjemahan lepas dan singkat. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
1 day 19 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1penerus perusahaan ini nantinya Explanation: Agar lebih mengalir, mungkin bisa diakalin seperti ini. Saya memang bukan pendiri, namun saya lah penerus perusahaan ini suatu saat nanti. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 19 hrs (2019-07-21 00:15:58 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Pendiri ---> Penerus |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Reference comments
3 days 22 hrs |
| Reference: Revised English Reference information: "I am not the founder but I am next in line to succeed the company." has already been identified as not being correct formal English. However, the suggestions to amend this sentence to "I am not the founder but I am next in line to succeed to the company." are not appropriate, for two reasons: (1) the phrase "to succeed to" is not a very common phrase, and is typically used in only conjunction with royalty; (2) even then, the thing which is "succeeded to" is not the domain/realm, but rather the role/title/position (and most especially "the throne"). https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/succeed to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/succeed So this is appropriate: "The princess succeeded to the throne." But these are not: "The princess succeeded to Denmark." "The academic succeeded to Senior Lecturer." Correct formal English would be something like: "I am not the founder but I am next in line to succeed (to) the leadership of the company." "I am not the founder but I am next in line to succeed the founder [i.e. the current leader] of the company." "I am not the founder but I am next in line to succeed within the company." or indeed "I am not the founder but I am next in line to lead the company." "I am not the founder but I am next in line to take over [those duties within] the company." -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 4 days (2019-07-24 01:30:52 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- By the way, the "founder" is the person who established the company. It is not logically possible for anybody to 'take over' as the 'new' "founder" after the company has already been established. However, after founding the company, the founder was presumably the leader and/or owner of the company — probably both, at least initially. Sometimes a founder may sell the company while remaining the leader (CEO or whatever). Other times the founder may step aside from running the business, and appoint other people as CEO, CFO, etc., but still retain the ownership of the company — even just as a shareholder. More context would be needed to know which applies in the case of the current source text. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations