20:34 May 18, 2005 |
|
English to Latvian translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / licence agreement | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | Tiesības uz tiesas aizstāvību saskaņā ar taisnīgumu |
| ||
2 | šī nav atbilde |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
šī nav atbilde Explanation: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=5&q=Equitable Relie... "relief (as an injunction) available under a court's equitable powers" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
The asker has declined this answer |
Tiesības uz tiesas aizstāvību saskaņā ar taisnīgumu Explanation: Tiesības uz tiesas aizstāvību saskaņā ar taisnīgumu - manupraat, ir pareizi (nu varbuut var pamainiit uz taisniiguma normaam). 14.gs varbuut taa arii bija, ka cilveekam bija jaameklee paliidziiba augstaakaa instancee, tacu man liekas, ka te ir kas cits domaats. Ja es pareizi saprotu, siis teemas sakaraa ir izdalīti divi prasiibu apmierinaasanas veidi - peec likuma burta vai arii saskanaa ar taisniiguma normaam. Muusdienaas abi ir sapluudusi, tacu, piemeeram, ASV ir stati, kur pastaav equity tiesas, kur prasiitaajs var pieprasiit noteiktu veidu, kaadaa vina prasiiba ir jaapmierina, pretstataa tiesu procesiem, kur tiesa piespriez vienkaarsi naudas sodu. Piemeeram, ja vienam onkuliitim nosper kazu, vins equity tiesaa var pieprasiit atpakal tiesi to pashu kazu, tieshi taadaa pashaa staavoklii, kaada taa bijusi, veel paluugt kazas nolaupiitaajam,teiksim, katru sveetdienu kazu apciemot un vinai atvainoties par nodariito kaiteejumu. Parastajaa tiesaa toties tiks apreeekinaata kazas un radiito zaudeejumu veertiiba naudaa. The distinction between "legal" and "equitable" relief is an important aspect of the American legal system. The right of jury trial in civil cases is guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution, but only in cases that traditionally would have been handled by the law courts at Common Law. The question of whether a case should be determined by a jury depends largely on the type of relief the plaintiff requests. If a plaintiff requests damages in the form of money or certain other forms of relief, such as the return of a specific item of property, the remedy is considered legal, and the American Constitution guarantees a right to a trial by jury. On the other hand, if the plaintiff requests an injunction, declaratory judgment, specific performance or modification of contract, or other non-monetary relief, the claim would usually be one in equity -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 48 days (2005-07-06 13:04:41 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- liidz ar to dokumentaa mineetaa firma jau ieprieks paredz, ka zaudeejumu gadiijumaa taa varees pieprasiit kaadu iipasu zaudeejumu atliidzinaasanas veidu, varbuut liiguma prieksmeta veertiiba ir ne tikai finansiaala. Reference: http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:sVBixOqrteEJ:en.wikipedia... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
The asker has declined this answer |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.