GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10:01 May 10, 2011 |
English to Spanish translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Printing & Publishing | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Toni Romero Spain Local time: 18:50 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | resistente a la fricción en seco y en húmedo |
| ||
4 | resistente al frote húmedo y seco |
| ||
4 | resistente al frote seco y con aceite |
|
dry and oil rub resistant resistente a la fricción en seco y en húmedo Explanation: Aunque diga aceite, así debe de ser a mi modo de ver |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
dry and oil rub resistant resistente al frote húmedo y seco Explanation: I tried doing a search of the term "dry and oil rub resistant" and only managed to get hits on the HP products so I'll go for a simple translation: rub resistant -> resistente al frote Dry and Oil -> húmedo y seco I've seen wet rub resistant, but never oil rub resistant, I suppose it might mean something similar but might be a propietary name from HP |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
dry and oil rub resistant resistente al frote seco y con aceite Explanation: Creo que la traducción literal es lo que procede aquí. En principio, "oil rub resistant" no es sinónimo de "wet rub resistant": las propiedades que hacen que el papel o la tinta sean resistentes al frote húmedo (con agua o sustancias acuosas) no los harán resistentes al aceite (o sustancias oleosas). Efectivamente, el siguiente documento, una patente estadounidense para una tinta de impresión, establece explícitamente la diferencia, haciendo pruebas con aceite para niños: "These tests show that approximately 75:25 PUD to -82 Tg° C. acrylic provide wet and baby oil rub resistance that is greater than the additive effect of their respective parts. However, as previously demonstrated in FIG. 4, dry rub resistance is primarily a function of the PUD and the acrylic actually exerts an antagonistic effect. [0061]Having once established that 75:25 PUD/acrylic combination was unexpectedly synergistic, the applicant then went on to determine the optimum level of talc to de-tackify 75:25 PUD/acrylic with cyan pigment. This was determined by testing dry, wet and baby oil rub at increasing talc concentrations as shown below in Table 7 and FIG. 7 http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090221736 |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.