deemed
English translation: considered/thought of as
| 20:36 Nov 15, 2004 |
| English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] Tech/Engineering - Accounting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|  Selected response from: Robert Donahue (X) | |||
Grading comment
| ||||
| SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 +3 | considered/thought of as |
| ||
| 5 | This employee replacement . . . |
| ||
| 4 | slight change |
| ||
| 4 | This employee replacement shall not be deemed AS A premature termination of Contractor agreement |
| ||
| 3 -1 | Not really ;-) |
|
Answers
3 mins confidence: 
slight change Explanation: This employee replacement shall not be deemed premature termination of the contract. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
3 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): -1
peer agreement (net): -1Not really ;-) Explanation: This employee replacement will not necessarily lead to premature termination of Contractor agreement. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
22 mins confidence:
This employee replacement shall not be deemed AS A premature termination of Contractor agreement Explanation: If you want to use "to be deemed", as in your original phrase, you will need to add 'as a". Alternatively, Michel's phrase is a good one. I hope it helps, Neil. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 25 mins (2004-11-15 21:02:19 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- This employee replacement shall not be deemed AS A premature termination of THE Contractor\'S agreement -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 26 mins (2004-11-15 21:03:26 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- we need a definite article (the) in this case as it talks about a \'unique\' contractor agreement :) |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
21 hrs confidence:
This employee replacement . . . Explanation: . . . shall not be considered to an indication of, or basis for, premature termination of Contractor agreement. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 days 19 hrs 42 mins (2004-11-18 16:18:42 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Please read \"considered to be an\" in place of \"considered to an\" in the sentence above. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
260 days confidence: peer agreement (net): +3
peer agreement (net): +3considered/thought of as Explanation: You don't give sufficient context to properly answer this but here is my take on this. There is an agreement. I assume that it lists employees (perhaps by name). This is fairly common when discussing a Governemt/Contractor relationship, especially if there are security clearance or access issues involved. Obviously there is a clause in this agreement that allows for replacement of employees (due to illness, incompetence, etc). Since (in my theory) this agreement lists employees by name, this clause is inserted so that replacement of an employee will not be considered a premature/early termination of this Contractor agreement. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||