18:41 Sep 3, 2008 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Internet, e-Commerce / software | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Jack Dunwell France Local time: 21:29 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +4 | with and using |
| ||
4 | See |
|
See Explanation: If "By" then "Profiles will do it If "With" then it will be by using "Profiles" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
with and using Explanation: I would prefer using and with in your case. Constructions can be designed with/using Profiles. It is possible to design constructions with/using Profiles. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 8 mins (2008-09-03 18:49:46 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- BTW, a good many alternatives are possible. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 53 mins (2008-09-03 19:35:03 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- A good option: You can use Profiles to design constructions. I strongly recommend not using inversion, anything like, "With Profiles can be designed constructions." |
| |