12:04 Jun 2, 2006 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Art/Literary - Printing & Publishing / Style | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Attila Piróth France Local time: 12:24 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +5 | only quotation marks |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
only quotation marks Explanation: Using both of them is superfluous. Quotation marks clearly show that part in question is taken from elsewhere - there is no need to emphasize the text with italics. I would opt for quotation marks in this case - simply because you repeat word by word what was said in section 4.1. Italics would be likely to mean: this is very important. Periods and commas always precede closing quotation marks (The Chicago Manual of Style, 6.8). If possible, the opening quotation marks should precede "the" - i.e., if the sentence in Section 4.1 contains "the". If you stick to the original format, then: CMS, 6.3: Punctuation and font: primary system -- All punctuation marks should appear in the same font---roman or italic---as the main or surrounding text, except for punctuation that belongs to a title or an exclamation in a different font... 6.6 ... parentheses and brackets should appear in the same font---roman or italic---as the surrounding text, not in that of the material they enclose. *** 6.3 has several examples, among them: We heard his cries of "Help!" No period; the exclamation mark and the quotation marks are italicized. So, this is what you should do if you keep the original format. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||