17:48 Nov 6, 2008 |
Finnish to English translations [PRO] Poetry & Literature / X suurlähetystö hoitaa maata X jalkamaana. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Spencer Allman United Kingdom Local time: 12:58 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | representation through dual accreditation |
| ||
3 | has no consular representation |
| ||
1 | dependency |
| ||
1 | satellite |
| ||
1 | linked |
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
dependency Explanation: What is the Finnish definition for jalkamaa? |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
satellite Explanation: I don't know but it is an interesting question Is the UK a satellite of the USA? (for example) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
linked Explanation: Using the examples of Sweden and Finland, this concept could be translated as something like this: "The X embassy treats Finland as a linked/associated/related country and looks after all matters to do with Finland through its embassy in Sweden." If you want to bring in the derogatory nature of "jalkamaa", you could also say e.g. "...treats Finland almost as a part of Sweden and therefore looks after all matters to do with Finland through its embassy in Sweden..." or something like that. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
representation through dual accreditation Explanation: So this isn't a direct translation, but I can't seem to find a word referring to a country that doesn't have an ambassador in residence, but which has accredited an ambassador who lives in a nearby country. There may be such a word. In any case, when an ambassador is assigned to multiple countries, this is called dual accreditation. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 52 mins (2008-11-06 18:41:22 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Whipping boy! Dogsbody! Footstool! j/k Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_accreditation |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
has no consular representation Explanation: this is what we would normally say, I think but, of course, this is not derogatory, as my former suggestion (not an excellent one, I admit) was |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.