préavis de location

17:04 Aug 25, 2020 

is that this is one of those "belt and braces" term often encountered in legal documents. "There's nobody in the property nor has notice to terminate been served on or by any tenant (whether or not actually in the property)"

13:32 Aug 25, 2020 

Hello
I withdrew that idea as a Google search in Internet showed that prévis de location was indeed used for tenants leaving
Now you make me wonder again.

12:58 Aug 25, 2020 

to a possible trap.

There are enough elements to have some doubts.

As this is a contract, I think a thorough check would be in order. I would for sure ask the client to clarify.

BTW what you talk about is in fact "un préavis de fin de location" - plenty of samples of that, for sure.

But I can't see nothing that would exclude the possibility that HERE it's about "un préavis de début de location".

12:04 Aug 25, 2020 

1) Please show us a préavis de location sent in by a préfet - an avis de réquisition would be far more likely.
2) Just have a look at what people (not lawyers) say when they have questions about ending their lease and how they describe it.

11:26 Aug 25, 2020 

the meaning that WOULD make sense in this list is:

there is no [future / coming] tenant waiting to move in

THAT would make sense also if coming after "requisition" - is would be another case of a property currently empty that is about to be no longer empty / availalble for occupation.

Having said that, I'm not sure what would be legal situation in France if the landlord rents you a property and then sells it just before you move in - would that affect in any way the new owner?

I would check with the client - if the buyer finds newly moved in tenants imposed by "le préfet" there could be some really awkward questions about the translation ... (see refs)

13:42 Aug 22, 2020 

Hello

I think that would be préavis de quitter un apartment. Here, I think it's the opposite. No tenant is "moving in" so the property is and will be "libre de toute occupation" when acquired.

13:35 Aug 22, 2020 

Yes, it seems to be the notice served by the tenant on the landlord, even though that isn't what it sounds like. https://droit-finances.commentcamarche.com/faq/6845-lettre-d...

This might be intended to cover a situation where the tenant had already moved out, but their period of notice hadn't yet expired. In that case the property is still deemed to be occupied, because the tenant could move back in or store things in the property for the remainder of the notice period.