07:49 Jul 14, 2009 |
German to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Environment & Ecology / recycling | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Selected response from: polyglot45 | ||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | registered via the momomers of which they are composed |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
"registered indirectly via" |
|
registered via the momomers of which they are composed Explanation: http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:OsYm1NIi_pMJ:www.atc-eu... read the whole text - not long - it explains that polymers are made up of different monomers and therefore there is no point in registering them separately, as and when each of their individual monomers have already been registered as such |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
34 mins |
Reference: "registered indirectly via" Reference information: 45. Understood in that way, Article 6(3) of the REACH Regulation would indeed – as argued by Erbslöh and S.P.C.M. – be in conflict with Article 2(9). Practically every polymer marketed in Europe would have to be registered indirectly via its monomer substances. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.