I apologize for not replying sooner. Actually, I agree with all of what you said. I was merely trying to point out that while you're right (and your discussion post is helpful!), I take issue with the asker's response here.
This Q is the equivalent of asking for the BGB initialism while giving §236 BGB as an example. It takes me about 5 seconds to look that up (which is what writeaway suggested). First link:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__236.htmlNow, not everyone's Google is the same (personalized settings, location and all that), but not finding this is hard to imagine. In the asker's situation, I'd have simply said that I didn't see the forest for the trees or something. That happens and it's fine! But getting testy while not searching for 5 seconds on Google is beyond me.
There is, by the way, a probably more helpful way to search ProZ, though it may not always work. If you type in the term you're looking for, enter your language pair and add site:proz.com, you can also look for words that may be related to your query but won't show up on ProZ because they're part of a d-box post/reference/answer the asker didn't choose.
In any case, enjoy your weekend!