majątek vs. wartość majątkowa
English translation: assets/property vs items of value
| 21:12 Aug 28, 2020 |
| Polish to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Law: Contract(s) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: mike23 Poland Local time: 14:44 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 +1 | wealth vs. items of value/assets |
| ||
| 2 +2 | assets/property vs items of value |
|
| Discussion entries: 2 | |
|---|---|
Answers
2 hrs confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1wealth vs. items of value/assets Explanation: WARTOŚCI MAJĄTKOWE appear to refer to individual items that possess value (and their source can be tracked one by one) whereas MAJĄTEK is a comprehensive notion (and its source could be banking, stock market gains, etc., as a whole). |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
11 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +2
peer agreement (net): +2assets/property vs items of value Explanation: assets vs items of value Tak przypuszczam po krótkiej lekturze źródeł zagranicznych money laundering as a means to justify seizing valuable assets, including cash, bank deposits, stock, motor vehicles, real property, and other items of value. https://www.mctexaslaw.com/what-is-money-laundering Another important issue that comes up frequently is the management of forfeitable assets located abroad. Many governments lack the infrastructure or legal regime required to actively manage property such as real estate, planes, boats, and other items that might require active management or special handling. ... Generally, the Government may seize bank accounts, cars, boats, aircraft, jewelry, and other items of value pursuant to a warrant after proving that restraining the property would not be effective. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2013... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 11 hrs (2020-08-29 08:56:10 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Property seized for evidence can automatically be forfeited:This common error results in many missed opportunities for forfeiture. Each type of forfeitureset forth below contains strict time limits. Once missed, the Government is prohibited from commencing forfeiture under the time-barred provision. For this reason, it is critical for investigators to consult with their asset forfeiture personnel regardingany item that they do not wish to return to the person from whom it was seized. All property owned by a criminal is subject to forfeiture: On the contrary, asset forfeiture is purely a creature of statute. While there are numerous federal laws providing for forfeiture, there are also some crimes that do not have a corresponding forfeiture statute. Other crimes have only limited forfeiture provisions. Asset forfeiture and restitution are mutually exclusive:Actually, asset forfeiture relates to the amount of proceeds generated by a crime and, in some cases, the actual property used to commit a crime, while restitution relates to the amount of losses caused by a crime. By statute, judges are required to order both where applicable. https://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question. You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. KudoZ™ translation helpThe KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also: Search millions of term translations Your current localization setting
English
Select a language Close search
| ||