GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16:13 Aug 10, 2015 |
Serbian to English translations [PRO] Science - Mathematics & Statistics / Kombinatorika | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Mira Stepanovic Serbia Local time: 06:03 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +1 | rook polynomial |
| ||
4 | shell polynomial |
| ||
3 | canonical polynomial (form) |
|
canonical polynomial (form) Explanation: Потражите следећи текст (у ПДФ формату) о овоме: „SOME EXTENSIONS OF THE LANCZOS-ORTIZ THEORY OF CANONICAL POLYNOMIALS IN THE TAU METHOD“. Такође Вам можда помогне и ово. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_form http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/library/GPC/html/indexCardinal.... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
rook polynomial Explanation: U ovom konkretnom kontekstu, u kombinatorici - tip = figura u šahu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_polynomial šahovske figure - top = rook -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 43 mins (2015-08-10 16:56:35 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Gore treba top = figura u šahu a ne "tip" kako sam greškom napisala. :-) Ovo je objašnjenje dato na prethodno navedenom linku: In combinatorial mathematics, a rook polynomial is a generating polynomial of the number of ways to place non-attacking rooks on a board that looks like a checkerboard; that is, no two rooks may be in the same row or column. --- The term rook polynomial was coined by John Riordan. Despite the name's derivation from chess, the impetus for studying rook polynomials is their connection with counting permutations (or partial permutations) with restricted positions. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
shell polynomial Explanation: A specific type of Hosoya-Diudea polynomial which arises naturally in relation to "Hall's theorem" which I think is what's being referred to as "teorema Hola" Philip Hall (1935). |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.