| 주제 내 페이지: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] > |
What cliches do you dislike the most? 스레드 게시자: jyuan_us
|
|---|
To your point.
Ugh. I hear this one more an more.
| | | |
North of.
As in "inflation is forecast to be north of 14% in the coming year"
| | | |
The optics (i.e. what something looks like, or the impression it gives)
As in "the optics of Liz Truss's premiership were terrible".
| | | |
To "speak to" something (i.e. talk about it).
As in
"Can you speak to the fourth item on the agenda?"
| | |
|
|
|
| An interesting thread taking shape | Dec 28, 2022 |
Tom in London wrote:
Isabelle Rodriguez wrote:
..... you are not humbled, you are PROUD, which is the exact opposite  Right?
That's definitely an intolerable cliche.
Pride is one of the seven deadly sins and comes before a fall
It's the first time I see the word "humbled" being used in this sense, but I can't agree more with the comment on "proud": I always thought the fact that certain people would start building their values around being proud of something was supposed to mean that their moral compass had gone haywire, but then I'm also confident I'd get a huge number of points on the bigot scale by appreciating things like religion, etc. I wonder if I should be ashamed of writing a post with "my two cents" in it. I guess I should have gone for the "my five kopecks" version. Btw, I like the "north of" thing. It doesn't deserve to be on the list of hatable clichés for the sole reason of being overused (I've been lucky to have avoided contact with people who overuse this expression in ways that would make it obnoxious to me)
| | | |
Metin Demirel wrote:
With that mindset (which I speculate that they have), any word in the English language can be found impersonal, lacking interest, passive–aggressive, or sarcastic. With that mindset 'How are you?' can be seen offensive by some too: when someone says 'How are you?' they don't actually care about you. And you don't even need to reply with 'Thank you, I'm fine' because that question does not require any response at all.
By the way
Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida wrote:
What I dislike the most is that English clichés tend to infiltrate other languages The How-are-you attitude has also infiltrated into the Russian language too. Several years ago this question supposed a brief convo. These days, when you meet somebody saying 'Как дела' (equivalent of 'How are you'), next thing you see in a moment is their fading back...
[Edited at 2022-12-28 12:02 GMT]
| | | |
Large agencies recruiting translators in thousands, they all call us "talents". While offering mind-blowing MT-editing tasks for 0.01 USD / segment, they still call us "talents" and sometimes even "contributors". As if we should feel flattered.
| | | |
Metin Demire (X)
터키
Local time: 00:19
이탈리아어에서 터키어
+ ...
| under the sun | Dec 28, 2022 |
Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida wrote:
What I dislike the most is that English clichés tend to infiltrate other languages and to be translated literally...
In the last couple of years, I come across some expressions used in Turkish that were stolen from English, like "at the end of the day" or "under the sun".
| | |
|
|
|
Tom in London wrote:
Uptalking. Just in general? Where every statement is voiced like a question? As in Valley Girl talk?
Valley Girl talk?
It's a well-known fact that Uptalking was invented by the Daleks.
| | | |
Nikolay Novitskiy wrote:
Large agencies recruiting translators in thousands, they all call us "talents". While offering mind-blowing MT-editing tasks for 0.01 USD / segment, they still call us "talents" and sometimes even "contributors". As if we should feel flattered.
At least they don't call us "resources".
| | | |
Andy Watkinson wrote:
.... Uptalking was invented by the Daleks.
No - the way the Daleks talk is Glottal Fry.
| | | |
Dan Lucas 
영국
Local time: 22:19
회원(2014)
일본어에서 영어
Tom in London wrote:
At least they don't call us "resources".
I and my peers were sometimes referred to in management materials as CFAs - "client-facing assets".
On a more serious note, Japanese companies use the phrase "human resources" with no awareness that it might have a dehumanising effect. It should be straightforward to explain that the implication that humans are fungible assets is not a good look for a company that claims to care, but in reality it isn't easy.
Dan
| | |
|
|
|
MollyRose
미국
Local time: 16:19
영어에서 스페인어
+ ...
I agree, Personnel is a better title for that department. Have you ever heard of human capital? Ew!!!
An annoying cliché I've noticed recently is "take-away." Or, what will you take away from the session today? On my answer to the survey question, I wrote what I would prefer that they take away, or eliminate!
| | | |
jyuan_us
미국
Local time: 17:19
회원(2005)
영어에서 중국어
+ ...
주제 스타터 | Second to none | Dec 29, 2022 |
"Second to none." That's a good one.
| | | |
Thank you for "reaching out" to us. Your call is very important. Please wait while the next available executive is able to assist you.
"Going forward".
| | | |
| 주제 내 페이지: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] > |
Login to reply/comment 
