German term
Beispiel
2 +5 | example | Derek Gill Franßen |
5 -1 | Sample | Ebru Kopf |
3 +1 | inventive example, exemplary embodiment | Translation-Pro |
Non-PRO (1): Brie Vernier
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
example
agree |
Edith Kelly
: it could be anything ... asker gives no context so example will do here ... though I suspect that embodiment is really meant here
9 mins
|
I agree, also that "embodiment" could very well be what was meant.
|
|
agree |
Ruth Wiedekind
: I al´so found "example" in one of my latest patents (EN-DE) - though all depends from the context.
11 mins
|
Thank you, Ruth. :)
|
|
agree |
Jon Fedler
24 mins
|
agree |
John Speese
: Illustrative embodiment is also used, but again context would help.
3 hrs
|
agree |
Serena Hiller
6 hrs
|
Sample
U.S. Patent. Nov. 9, 2000 Sheet 2 of 2 US 6543210 B1. Sample Patent, page 2 .... Sample Patent, page 6. 5. 2, with the elongate members below planar ...
http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/IntroPat.pdf/$file/IntroPat.pdf
http://www.library.ubc.ca/scieng/chem121/module2/module2_14.html
disagree |
Edith Kelly
: Sorry to disagree again but simply taking google as a reference, without being versed in patentese, does not make a lot of sense
7 mins
|
no problem you can disagree as much as you want or you find necessary, I am learning here in Kudoz as well every response is important to me. Thnx.
|
inventive example, exemplary embodiment
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2008-02-04 19:40:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/fr/ia.jsp?LANGUAGE=FR&IA=US2006/03...
Discussion