Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
(with or without) traverse
Polish translation:
(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
Added to glossary by
mike23
Jan 7, 2016 13:00
8 yrs ago
4 viewers *
English term
(with or without) traverse
English to Polish
Law/Patents
Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright
zastrzeżenia patentowe
Wg amerykańskiego CFR (Code of Federal Regulations):
"The election of an invention or species may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to petition, the election must be made with traverse. If the reply (to the action of the US Patent and Trademark Office) does not distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election shall be treated as an election without traverse. Traversal must be presented at the time of election to be considered timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144"
"The election of an invention or species may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to petition, the election must be made with traverse. If the reply (to the action of the US Patent and Trademark Office) does not distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election shall be treated as an election without traverse. Traversal must be presented at the time of election to be considered timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144"
Proposed translations
(Polish)
| 2 | (z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych |
mike23
|
Change log
Jan 11, 2016 12:05: mike23 Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
1 day 18 hrs
Selected
(z lub bez) sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
z lub bez sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do (ograniczenia zakresu zastrzeżeń patentowych lub) wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s818.html
Więcej w dyskusji
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day19 hrs (2016-01-09 08:01:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
When two or more independent and distinct inventions are presented for examination, the examiner may make a restriction requirement if a serious burden exists. In the reply to the restriction requirement, applicant must elect one invention for examination. If applicant wishes to traverse the restriction requirement, the reply must also include a traversal with specific reasons why applicant believes the restriction requirement is in error.
...
Election in reply to a requirement for restriction may be made either with or without an accompanying traverse of the requirement. A complete reply to a restriction requirement must include an election even if applicant traverses the requirement.
A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse, distinctly and specifically pointing out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for his or her conclusion that the requirement is in error. The absence of any statement indicating whether the requirement to restrict is traversed or the failure to provide reasons for traverse will be treated as an election without traverse.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s818.html
Więcej w dyskusji
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day19 hrs (2016-01-09 08:01:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
When two or more independent and distinct inventions are presented for examination, the examiner may make a restriction requirement if a serious burden exists. In the reply to the restriction requirement, applicant must elect one invention for examination. If applicant wishes to traverse the restriction requirement, the reply must also include a traversal with specific reasons why applicant believes the restriction requirement is in error.
...
Election in reply to a requirement for restriction may be made either with or without an accompanying traverse of the requirement. A complete reply to a restriction requirement must include an election even if applicant traverses the requirement.
A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse, distinctly and specifically pointing out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for his or her conclusion that the requirement is in error. The absence of any statement indicating whether the requirement to restrict is traversed or the failure to provide reasons for traverse will be treated as an election without traverse.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Dziękuję, wykorzystałam tę wersję"
Discussion
---
z lub bez sprzeciwu wobec wezwania do (ograniczenia zakresu zastrzeżeń patentowych lub) wydzielenia zgłoszeń patentowych
--
Election in reply to a requirement for restriction may be made either with or without an accompanying traverse of the requirement. A complete reply to a restriction requirement must include an election even if applicant traverses the requirement.
A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse, distinctly and specifically pointing out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for his or her conclusion that the requirement is in error. The absence of any statement indicating whether the requirement to restrict is traversed or the failure to provide reasons for traverse will be treated as an election without traverse.