Feb 19, 2023 10:37
1 yr ago
39 viewers *
English term

so the lawyers better

English Other General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters
But what do you mean by “peace,” and what do you mean by “law?” What kind of law? I don't want Socialism through Soviet law. I don't even want peace through Soviet law. So the lawyers better get straight down themselves and ask themselves the meaning of words. There are two stages of life the Communists always take over: one is the control over money, and two is the control over words, language.

https://youtu.be/37HgRWTsGs0?t=5218

Your help will be much appreciated, thank you very much.
Change log

Feb 19, 2023 10:37: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

Non-PRO (1): Yvonne Gallagher

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Responses

1 hr
Selected

... it would be better that the lawyers be honest with themselves...

... and ask themselves the meaning of words
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+1
1 hr

so the lawyers should

Peer comment(s):

agree Tony M
5 mins
Something went wrong...
+2
1 hr

'had' is missing

so the lawyers had better

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2023-02-19 11:52:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The lawyers are advised to 'get straight down themselves', whatever that might be
Peer comment(s):

agree Tony M : It's not really "missing" — this is a typical construction in spoken EN-US; if listened craefully, it's probably "...layers'd better", with the 'd' almost lost.
6 mins
agree MARINA MOTA
26 days
Something went wrong...
26 days

So the lawyers'd better... É melhor que os advogados...

So the lawyers'd better...
Similarly to "you'd better believe it", or "she'd better do it".
'd=had
This structure is very common in conversations, even though, most of the time, "had" is not said or is not noticeable.
you'd better believe it = Acredite. Pode acreditar.
she'd better do it = é melhor que ela faça (in a demanding way)
Something went wrong...
40 days

Therefore the lawyers would be well advised

"So the lawyers better" - reads and will be understood as a demand /instruction where what the writer should aim for is to not antagonise the audience readers but rather gain their respect by instead allowing the content to be understood as kindly advice given.
Example sentence:

Therefor the lawyers would be better advised /well advised to get themselves aquainted with the meaning of certain words.

Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search