Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
further your affiant sayeth naught
Hebrew translation:
אין למצהיר שום דבר להוסיף
Feb 7, 2020 04:55
4 yrs ago
13 viewers *
English term
Rachelle Avital
further your affiant sayeth naught
English to Hebrew
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Law
What is this in Hebrew? It appears at the end of an affidavit.
Proposed translations
(Hebrew)
| 1 | אין למצהיר שום דבר להוסיף |
Sandra & Kenneth Grossman
|
Change log
Feb 7, 2020 04:55: Karen Zaragoza changed "Vetting" from "Needs Vetting" to "Vet OK"
Feb 7, 2020 04:55: Karen Zaragoza changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"
Proposed translations
9 hrs
Sandra & Kenneth Grossman
Israel
Israel
Native in English
Works in field
Israel
Quality, Reliability, Experience.
Native in: English 
, Romanian
Works in: French to English, Hebrew to English, Romanian to English, and 3 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
16
Selected
אין למצהיר שום דבר להוסיף
I haven't found this formula in Hebrew, but if you have to translate it at all, I'm guessing it should be sth like this.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2020-02-07 14:38:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Both your suggestions are OK! I would go for either of them, even under affidavit :)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2020-02-07 14:38:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Both your suggestions are OK! I would go for either of them, even under affidavit :)
Note from asker:
| Thanks. If I were to guess, I would write תמו דברי המצהיר or עד כאן דברי התצהיר or עד כאן דברי המצהיר. |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Reference comments
9 hrs
Sandra & Kenneth Grossman
Israel
Israel
Native in English
Works in field
Israel
Quality, Reliability, Experience.
Native in: English , Romanian
Works in: French to English, Hebrew to English, Romanian to English, and 3 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
16
Reference:
“Further affiant sayeth naught”
“The affiant says nothing further.”
But here’s the most important question of all: Is the phrase really needed at all? No. It’s an antiquarian superfluity. Think of translating it as “That’s all, folks!” Truly, one might simply take the sensible approach that when the affiant (uh-fye-uhnt) hath nothing further to say, the affiant merely stoppeth.
https://www.lawprose.org/lawprose-lesson-149-further-affiant...
But here’s the most important question of all: Is the phrase really needed at all? No. It’s an antiquarian superfluity. Think of translating it as “That’s all, folks!” Truly, one might simply take the sensible approach that when the affiant (uh-fye-uhnt) hath nothing further to say, the affiant merely stoppeth.
https://www.lawprose.org/lawprose-lesson-149-further-affiant...
Note from asker:
| Agreed. But in legal translation, one doesn't always have the option of just leaving s/t out... |
Something went wrong...