Jul 13, 2010 16:43
13 yrs ago
48 viewers *
Romanian term
atragerea raspunderii
Romanian to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
- Cauza are ca obiect procedura insolventei - actiune in atragerea raspunderii.
- Se retine ca cererea in atragerea raspunderii formulata de creditor a fost solutionata in sensul admiterii.
- Se retine ca cererea in atragerea raspunderii formulata de creditor a fost solutionata in sensul admiterii.
Proposed translations
(English)
3 | personal liability (action/proceeding) | Annamaria Amik |
3 | action in liability | Sandra & Kenneth Grossman |
Proposed translations
18 hrs
Selected
personal liability (action/proceeding)
Vezi explicaţiile din discuţie.
Deocamdată nu sunt 100% convinsă, dar poate te ajută măcar ca idee de pornire. Sper să intervină şi să ne lumineze colegii jurişti :-)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 hrs (2010-07-14 11:10:59 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/pdf/Thornberg-v-COR.htm
The Commissioner assessed Marci Thornberg ('Appellant') with personal liability for Premier's unpaid tax liability by Order dated October 27, 2008 ('Order'). On December 23, 2008, Appellant filed a timely Appeal with this Court from the Order. On February 23, 2009, the Commissioner filed a timely Answer to the Appeal, affirmatively alleging that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the Notice that assessed Premier for sales tax liability.
The Commissioner seeks summary judgment as to Appellant's ***personal liability for Premier's unpaid sales/use tax*** based upon Appellant's admissions during discovery that she was the majority shareholder of Premier during the period of its tax liability, made several loans to the company, was a company officer with contract signing authority, and determined, solely or jointly with others, employee salaries for Premier and had joint authority to make hiring and firing decisions.
The parties also agree that Appellant had control of, supervision over, and responsibility for, jointly with Premier's accountant, filing the company's sales tax returns and making sales tax payments to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. There is no dispute as to Appellant's responsibility for day-to-day management at Premier.
Deocamdată nu sunt 100% convinsă, dar poate te ajută măcar ca idee de pornire. Sper să intervină şi să ne lumineze colegii jurişti :-)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 hrs (2010-07-14 11:10:59 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/pdf/Thornberg-v-COR.htm
The Commissioner assessed Marci Thornberg ('Appellant') with personal liability for Premier's unpaid tax liability by Order dated October 27, 2008 ('Order'). On December 23, 2008, Appellant filed a timely Appeal with this Court from the Order. On February 23, 2009, the Commissioner filed a timely Answer to the Appeal, affirmatively alleging that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the Notice that assessed Premier for sales tax liability.
The Commissioner seeks summary judgment as to Appellant's ***personal liability for Premier's unpaid sales/use tax*** based upon Appellant's admissions during discovery that she was the majority shareholder of Premier during the period of its tax liability, made several loans to the company, was a company officer with contract signing authority, and determined, solely or jointly with others, employee salaries for Premier and had joint authority to make hiring and firing decisions.
The parties also agree that Appellant had control of, supervision over, and responsibility for, jointly with Premier's accountant, filing the company's sales tax returns and making sales tax payments to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. There is no dispute as to Appellant's responsibility for day-to-day management at Premier.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Multumesc!"
13 hrs
action in liability
Cred ca despre asta e vorba.
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Annamaria Amik
: difera de actiunea in raspundere (liability proceeding). Eventual liability determination/creation proceeding
23 mins
|
Bune comentarii...
|
Discussion
- au folosit bunurile sau creditele persoanei juridice în folosul propriu sau în cel al unei alte persoane;- au făcut acte de comerţ în interes personal, sub acoperirea persoanei juridice;- au dispus, în interes personal, continuarea unei activităţi care ducea, în mod vădit, persoana juridică la încetarea de plăţi; - au ţinut o contabilitate fictivă, au făcut să dispară unele documente contabile sau nu au ţinut contabilitatea în conformitate cu legea; - au deturnat sau au ascuns o parte din activul persoanei juridice ori au mărit în mod fictiv pasivul acesteia; - au folosit mijloace ruinătoare pentru a procura persoanei juridice fonduri, în scopul întârzierii încetării de plăţi; -în luna precedentă încetării plăţilor, au plătit sau au dispus să se plătească cu preferinţă unui credit, în dauna ..
În partea de jos descrie succint procedura. Ar trebui întrebaţi colegii jurişti, dar cred că în mod normal, membrii comisiei de supraveghere/conducere (supervisory board, board of directors) nu răspund cu patrimoniul propriu, de aici "atragerea". Dar asta e doar o semi-educated guess.