Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Arabic term or phrase:
محكمة
English translation:
Peer-reviewed/ refereed
Added to glossary by
Saleh Dardeer
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2016-12-10 12:54:07 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Dec 7, 2016 11:16
7 yrs ago
12 viewers *
Arabic term
محكمة
Arabic to English
Social Sciences
Education / Pedagogy
المجلات العلمية
مجلة الجامعة الإسلامية للدراسات الاقتصادية والإدارية مجلة علمية محكمة ربع سنوية، تصدرها شئون البحث العلمي والدراسات العليا بالجامعة الإسلامية - غزة، وتقوم بنشر البحوث العلمية الأصيلة في مجالات الاقتصاد وإدارة الأعمال والعلوم التجارية المختلفة باللغتين العربية والإنجليزية من نتاج الباحثين في داخل الجامعة الإسلامية وخارجها والتي لم يسبق نشرها من قبل، وتعبر المواد المنشورة في المجلة عن آراء مؤلفيها ونتائجهم فقط ولا تنشر المجلة ما يتعارض تصريحاً أو تلميحاً مع فلسفة الجامعة الإسلامية وقيم الشعب الفلسطيني والتي تحمل الرقم المعياري الدولي ISSN: 2410-5198.
Proposed translations
(English)
5 +2 | Peer-reviewed/ refreed | Saleh Dardeer |
5 | elaborated | Marwa Omar |
Change log
Dec 10, 2016 17:42: Saleh Dardeer Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+2
3 mins
Selected
Peer-reviewed/ refreed
HTH
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2016-12-07 11:36:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review
http://guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/c.php?g=288333&p=1922599
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2016-12-07 11:37:05 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
مراجعة الأقران العلمية ( ويشار لها أحيانًا بالتحكيم) هي عملية نقد اعمال مؤلف ما العلمية، ابحاثه او افكاره ، وذلك من قبل نظير له يحمل مؤهلات معادلة لمؤهلاته او اعلى.
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/مراجعة_الأقران_العلمية
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2016-12-07 11:37:44 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief or the editorial board) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scientific journals, but does by no means prevent publication of all invalid research. Traditionally, peer reviewers have been anonymous, but there is currently a significant amount of open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2016-12-07 11:36:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review
http://guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/c.php?g=288333&p=1922599
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2016-12-07 11:37:05 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
مراجعة الأقران العلمية ( ويشار لها أحيانًا بالتحكيم) هي عملية نقد اعمال مؤلف ما العلمية، ابحاثه او افكاره ، وذلك من قبل نظير له يحمل مؤهلات معادلة لمؤهلاته او اعلى.
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/مراجعة_الأقران_العلمية
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2016-12-07 11:37:44 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief or the editorial board) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scientific journals, but does by no means prevent publication of all invalid research. Traditionally, peer reviewers have been anonymous, but there is currently a significant amount of open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review
Note from asker:
reference plz? |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
Something went wrong...