Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Japanese term or phrase:
転帰依頼者・転帰者
English translation:
requester of outcome entry / entry made by
Added to glossary by
Harry Oikawa
Jun 11, 2012 11:19
11 yrs ago
3 viewers *
Japanese term
転帰依頼者・転帰者
Japanese to English
Medical
Medical (general)
medical records
These appear as headings in a patient's hospital records in a table listing illnesses/injuries and outcomes (The patient suffered multiple injuries and subsequent complications so there are quite a lot of entries).
The table also includes outcome date, description of outcome, date and time outcome recorded, etc. The name under 転帰者 for each illness is invariably the name of the registrar (登録者). I would guess that the 転帰依頼者 is a doctor who makes a judgement about the outcome and asks for the outcome to be entered in the patient's records by the 転帰者, but it would be good to have this confirmed.
(転帰依頼者・転帰者are two separate headings but it makes sense to ask about them as a single question)
The table also includes outcome date, description of outcome, date and time outcome recorded, etc. The name under 転帰者 for each illness is invariably the name of the registrar (登録者). I would guess that the 転帰依頼者 is a doctor who makes a judgement about the outcome and asks for the outcome to be entered in the patient's records by the 転帰者, but it would be good to have this confirmed.
(転帰依頼者・転帰者are two separate headings but it makes sense to ask about them as a single question)
Proposed translations
(English)
3 | requester of outcome entry / entry made by | Harry Oikawa |
4 | See my explanation | humbird |
Change log
Jun 14, 2012 07:47: Harry Oikawa Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
9 hrs
Selected
requester of outcome entry / entry made by
As you are getting figured out, 転帰依頼者 is a whoever person (doctor, nurse or administrative staff) making a entry request to the doctor who is in charge of that patient for new outcome as a result of the recent treatment. Because only a doctor is allowed tp make an entry to the patient treatment record, 転帰者 is therefore a doctor who made that entry.
If your source text says 転帰依頼医 then it must be the requesting doctor for the outcome entry.
If your source text says 転帰依頼医 then it must be the requesting doctor for the outcome entry.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks. Your link was very useful"
5 hrs
See my explanation
In general I agree your guestimation on each word, so here is some idea I wish to share with you as I have sufficient experience in this area.
転帰 is variously translated into words such as "outcome", "exitus", "gross result", and/or "termination".
It is a stage of patient's illness whether the "outcome" is positive or negative. The patient is facing a critical stage where he/she be cured and discharged for good, or its polar opposite -- death.
Which way could be the way that is leading to the "outcome" I believe you know as you said part of the document you are dealing with has "description of outcome".
Yes the former is a person who has authority to direct and arrange the action for the patient (medical doctor, its designaged person such as nurse, etc.) and the latter very likely the person who is directly affected by the action.
But this is a bit cofusing because it could be the patient, or a medical personnel who takes the action in behalf of the patient.
Again you have the document and you have good ground to make that judgement of diffentiation.
転帰 is variously translated into words such as "outcome", "exitus", "gross result", and/or "termination".
It is a stage of patient's illness whether the "outcome" is positive or negative. The patient is facing a critical stage where he/she be cured and discharged for good, or its polar opposite -- death.
Which way could be the way that is leading to the "outcome" I believe you know as you said part of the document you are dealing with has "description of outcome".
Yes the former is a person who has authority to direct and arrange the action for the patient (medical doctor, its designaged person such as nurse, etc.) and the latter very likely the person who is directly affected by the action.
But this is a bit cofusing because it could be the patient, or a medical personnel who takes the action in behalf of the patient.
Again you have the document and you have good ground to make that judgement of diffentiation.
Reference comments
2 hrs
Reference:
FYI
転帰先の内訳は、自宅退院は 4 例、他院転院は 3 例であった。JSS-H 平均点において、自宅退院例は 0.43 ± 0.19point、他院 転院例は 10.27 ± 9.35point となった。JSS-H の評価項目別得点で比較すると、他院転院例は図形構成、類似性問題、注意 ・ 集 中力、考えの切り替えにおいて特に高い得点を示す傾向を認めた。
http://cjpta.jp/45th/pdf/P1_070.pdf
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/rika/18/2/18_2_75/_pdf
http://cjpta.jp/45th/pdf/P1_070.pdf
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/rika/18/2/18_2_75/_pdf
Discussion
転帰を依頼するという日本語は何か変ですよね。
また、治験には関係ないのでしょう?