This question was closed without grading. Reason: Other
Dec 4, 2013 16:06
10 yrs ago
Swedish term
Samlingsförsäkring
Swedish to English
Other
Insurance
IT Insurance Manual
Samlingsförsäkring Motor
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +2 | comprehensive insurance | Adrian MM. (X) |
4 +1 | Group insurance | Charlesp |
4 | Paketförsäkring | Mats Wiman |
4 | package insurance | Mats Wiman |
4 -1 | multi vehicle auto insurance policy | Sven Petersson |
4 -1 | Fleet insurance | Deane Goltermann |
Proposed translations
+2
1 hr
comprehensive insurance
How this differs from Kaskoförsäkring > a company can take out an SK for all-risks, but not a KF.
Comprehensive vs. third-party, fire and tdheft.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs (2013-12-04 21:14:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Literally, combined > comprehensive plus third-party elements.
Comprehensive vs. third-party, fire and tdheft.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs (2013-12-04 21:14:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Literally, combined > comprehensive plus third-party elements.
Reference:
http://www.kammarkollegiet.se/forsakringsavdelningen/sakforsakring/fordonsforsakring/motorfordon
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Sven Petersson
: Kindly see http://www.kammarkollegiet.se/forsakringsavdelningen/sakfors... - Addendum: Do pray read your own reference! Kindly read my discussion entry above!
1 hr
|
But that's exactly what I've quoted and 'prayed in aid' of my own answer! You must have read the quote carefully & not have been shooting from the hip.//Well, let's have your own suggestion: 1. combined 2. package 3. part-comprehensive 4. something else
|
|
agree |
Anna Herbst
: Reading your ref. I recognise my Australian comprehensive car insurance as the Kasko/samling.
7 hrs
|
Many thanks.
|
|
agree |
Deane Goltermann
: Comparing the definition provided here with several definitions of 'comprehensive auto insurance' (UK and US) shows this suggestion is as good as you're going to get.
13 hrs
|
Many thanks.
|
|
agree |
Mats Wiman
: In the case oaf car insurnce, Yes.
15 hrs
|
Tack, tack.
|
|
neutral |
Charlesp
: I am changing it to unsure - based on the new information posted. Doesn't look like comprehensive insurance is what was meant here - though it could be. Looks more like a group insurance.
20 hrs
|
thanks for the agree, but a rally race suggests either one or more cars > keeping Sven's answer 'on the boil'.//OK. I understand the shift. But we still need to know rough numbers.
|
11 mins
Paketförsäkring
I have one
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 hrs (2013-12-05 09:18:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry. My suggestion ought to have been 'package insurance'
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 hrs (2013-12-05 09:18:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry. My suggestion ought to have been 'package insurance'
Note from asker:
Could you please provide me the Translation for above word. |
17 hrs
package insurance
I was just discussing this with my insurer.
(The 'Add note' box did not accept my suggestion)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 hrs (2013-12-05 09:25:12 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The box obviously did accept it (see above)
(The 'Add note' box did not accept my suggestion)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 hrs (2013-12-05 09:25:12 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The box obviously did accept it (see above)
-1
20 hrs
multi vehicle auto insurance policy
In this context only.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2013-12-05 12:40:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Please see my discussion entry above!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2013-12-05 12:40:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Please see my discussion entry above!
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Deane Goltermann
: Samlingsförsäkring is apparently an industry specific term with a more specific meaning in reference to group insurance. Here we have a sentence suggested to answer a term - 5 words - with no industry or other reference. Added, this is another violation!
1 hr
|
Why don't you do what I did; phone an insurance company? - They will tell you what it means! When you have grasped the meaning you may try to compose an answer with less than 5 words. - A correct 5 word answer is, IMHO, better than a faulty 2 word one.
|
|
neutral |
Charlesp
: Looks like it is a "multi vehicle auto insurance policy," however one where there are different owners of the multiple vehicles.
2 hrs
|
That thought never entered my mind, but now, when I think about it, I must conclude that's a distinct possibility.
|
-1
20 hrs
Swedish term (edited):
Samlingsförsäkring (Motor)
Fleet insurance
Maybe we stand to be corrected, but in the event, you do see the term samlingsförsäkring in relation to 'group' insurance when it comes to people and their (other) things, as explained here, (even) http://www.kammarkollegiet.se/forsakringsavdelningen/personf... You can search this site for other examples of samlingsförsäkring.
But then when your are talking about 'Motor' or motor vehicles it seems you might want 'Fleet' insurance as offered on this site (http://www.qbeeurope.com/motor/fleet-insurance.asp).
Why the kammarkollegiate site seemingly misleadingly also uses 'samling' in combination kasko is, however, difficult to identify.
But then when your are talking about 'Motor' or motor vehicles it seems you might want 'Fleet' insurance as offered on this site (http://www.qbeeurope.com/motor/fleet-insurance.asp).
Why the kammarkollegiate site seemingly misleadingly also uses 'samling' in combination kasko is, however, difficult to identify.
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Sven Petersson
: "Fleet insurance" is not the only form of "Samlingsförsäkring Motor", kindly see my discussion entry @Tom. To translate "Samlingsförsäkring Motor" to "Fleet insurance" is like translating "frukt" to "banana"!
35 mins
|
This statement has no linguistic value as you have not referenced any accepted translation theory or other information regarding the asker's question or my answer. This seems to be in violation of the Kudoz rule I referenced above. Unfortunately.
|
+1
22 hrs
Group insurance
LO och Folksam har tagit fram en Samlingsförsäkring (företagsförsäkring) som skyddar vid de flesta skadesituationer.
In this case "Samlingsförsäkring" (the group insurance) covers a multitude of risks (a "polipolicy), for those eligible to subscribe to it.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 22 hrs (2013-12-05 14:19:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Here is another reference:
""
Universitetet har tecknat en samlingsförsäkring för utländska besökare ..... Swedish State Group Insurance and Personal Insurance.
http://www4.lu.se/upload/LUPDF/intsek/Handlaggning/Handboken...
In this case "Samlingsförsäkring" (the group insurance) covers a multitude of risks (a "polipolicy), for those eligible to subscribe to it.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 22 hrs (2013-12-05 14:19:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Here is another reference:
""
Universitetet har tecknat en samlingsförsäkring för utländska besökare ..... Swedish State Group Insurance and Personal Insurance.
http://www4.lu.se/upload/LUPDF/intsek/Handlaggning/Handboken...
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Sven Petersson
: Your references hardly fit the only context, "Samlingsförsäkring Motor", supplied by the Asker.
16 mins
|
yea, but that was before the Asker posted the information.
|
|
agree |
Deane Goltermann
: Like the guy says, context is king...
5 hrs
|
Discussion
Let wisdom rule and aim for a KudoZ truce. Lowers blood pressure and promotes good cooperation.
Without the context, and there surely is more here in the document, which the Askder could provide, it gives rise to this type of discussion and disagreement. There are times when such a discussion is appropriate and useful, but I don't think that is one of those cases here.
So Asker: how about posting some more details from your document!