jyuan_us May 15, 2014:

4 major errors found in the picked answer 1. bringing 2. offending 3. measures 4. under the wing of antitrust. The translation of these words/expressions means totally different to what they mean in the source text, not even close.

jyuan_us May 15, 2014:

这个句子完全没有“推出”之意， Bring 不是bring about，两者完全没有相似之处。句子结构是BRING。。。UNDER，其对象是已有的东西，而不是要推出什么。Therefore, it is an incorrectly picked answer and a wrong glossary entry.

David Lin May 15, 2014:

@jarv95888: 只是讨论一下。

measures = an official action that is done in order to achieve a particular aim 措施／方法

例句：The government is introducing tougher measures to combat crime 政府正引入更强硬的手段来反击犯罪。

austerity/security measures ＝ 紧缩／保安措施

offending ＝ guilty of a crime ＝ 有罪／违法的

－ 《牛津英汉双解词典》

原文：

offending measures ＝ 控制／防止 违规的措施 （并不指违反法律的措施）

如果是 “违反法律的措施’ 的话， 我们如何配合后句 ‘放在 anti-trust’ 的法律里？不合逻辑吧。

@jyuan: To be fair to Mi, I don't think it is not unprofessional for Askers to bring up a machine translation in Kudoz when asking for help. At least Mi has tried her best. To use machine translation is the last option and even so she was in doubt of the reliability of the machine answer and put the question forward in Kudoz.

On the other hand if we Answers were to provide a machine translation without manually scrutinized its suitability to the source text, we would be at fault and become irresponsible.

jyuan_us May 13, 2014:

Agree with Jarv Also, we are trying to be asker-friendly but both parties should have at least a minimum degree of professionalism. A general impression is that the temporary translations you provided for us to verify or as a context tend to be no better than something translated by a machine (if not worse, to say the least). For example: 在我们的研究范围中，各国的竞争法包含反竞争国家和当地行为，其中揭示出跨法域的明显形式. Isn't this a mechanic conversion of words that has made most of the major points senseless?

jarv95888 May 13, 2014:

Be careful of what you translate Hi，Mi. 知道你已关闭这项讨论，但是为了避免因为误解原意而翻译错误，在此赘言仅供参考。我对原文后半段的理解是：
"bring A under the wing of B" 是指让B受到A的保护。作者的意思是指：国家不制定这类法律将某些可能的措施定为非法，而是将这些措施界定在反垄断法的定义内。这也许是一种避重就轻的方法。
您选择的“以反垄断之名推出控制违规的措施”似乎有点倒因为果且有歧义（用反垄断之名来实施--控制违规的/措施 or 控制/违规的措施）。
不论是"控制违规的/措施" or "控制/违规的措施"都误解了原意。
the offending measures by the state 若还原成the offending measures (MADE) by the state 较容易了解。若国家不制定所提到的法律，这样一来便能将它可能违反这种法律的措施行为，界定在反垄断的法律规范下。
Again, this is only my humble understanding of the text for your reconsideration of your translation.