Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
Flush cache
Dutch translation:
cache wissen
Added to glossary by
MireilleR (X)
Feb 11, 2016 13:10
8 yrs ago
3 viewers *
English term
Flush cache
English to Dutch
Tech/Engineering
IT (Information Technology)
Opsomming ondersteunende functies op een website
Proposed translations
(Dutch)
| 5 +5 | cache wissen |
Joep Muijs
|
| 4 +4 | cache legen/leegmaken; legen/leegmaken van de cache |
Michael Beijer
|
Proposed translations
+5
12 mins
Selected
cache wissen
Hiermee wordt het wissen, of leegmaken, van de cache bedoeld.
Example sentence:
You can use the ipconfig /flushdns command to flush and reset the contents of the Domain Name System (DNS) client resolver cache
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Michael Beijer
4 mins
|
| agree |
Henk Sanderson
11 mins
|
| agree |
Lianne van de Ven
1 hr
|
| agree |
Kitty Brussaard
: Met 'leegmaken'
2 days 5 hrs
|
| agree |
Saskia de Korte
4 days
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+4
15 mins
Michael Beijer
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Native in English
Specializes in field
United Kingdom
Experienced technical/patent translator
Native in: English (Variants: British, US) 
Works in: Dutch to English, Flemish to English, English to Dutch, and 2 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
12
cache legen/leegmaken; legen/leegmaken van de cache
:-)
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Henk Sanderson
8 mins
|
|
Bedankt!
|
|
| agree |
Willem Wunderink
: Ik vindt 'legen'/'leeg maken' het beste, en niet wissen: de cache wordt 'leeg gemaakt' door de bestanden te 'wissen'. Het tijdelijk geheugen wordt nl. niet verwijderd maar is daarna leeg.
39 mins
|
|
Bedankt!
|
|
| agree |
Gerard de Noord
: Cache leegmaken
1 day 2 hrs
|
|
Bedankt Gerard!
|
|
| agree |
Kitty Brussaard
2 days 5 hrs
|
|
Thanks!
|
Discussion
The only information I have is this:
√ Credits
√ Contact support
√ Recommend the app
√ Connexion to external services
√ Flush cache
√ Force update of the app
cache leegmaken/legen
Can we have some more info about this cache? Does the author mean clear the cache of the browser? I assume so.
*** Edited to add: aha, I suspect Joep is right, in that it isn't the browser's cache, but that of the website itself. In any case, the answer is the same.