As a trial lawyer, you know that it’s not enough to merely limp across the finish line and get your exhibits admitted into evidence. - See more at: http://trialtheater.com/evidence/magic-phrases-for-admitting...
http://trialtheater.com/evidence/magic-phrases-for-admitting...

More evidence is likely to be admitted, regardless of its reliability or prejudicial effect. Evidence is admitted if the Judge decides it is relevant.
...
http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/...

Both state and federal rules of evidence serve as a guide for judges and attorneys so that they can determine whether to admit evidence—that is, whether to allow evidence to be observed by the judge or jury making factual conclusions in a trial.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/evidence

'Best' evidence means, for example, that first-hand evidence is preferred to second-hand evidence. Rules of fairness, for example, are intended to prevent evidence that is prejudicial, and is of little value in proving any relevant fact, from being admitted.
http://www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.gov.au/guides/defend_yourself...

Saya beri pilihan "items" jika ternyata ada beberapa barang bukti. Jika hanya satu, maka saya anjurkan menggunakan "item".

Indonesian term (edited): menetapkan barang bukti berupa

☕ Sedikit penelisikan tentang putusan pengadilan (a.l. http://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/84d2b849550f9274b... menghasilkan pola kalimat berikut:

AMAR: Menguatkan
CATATAN AMAR: ..... Menetapkan barang bukti berupa: -[nama barang] Dirampas untuk dimusnahkan, [nama barang] Digunakan dalam perkara atas nama...

☕ Jadi, kalimat di atas bukan untuk mengakui sesuatu sebagai barang bukti, melainkan memerintahkan apa yang harus dilakukan terhadap barang bukti setelah pengadilan menjatuhkan putusan.

✔ Karena itu, menetapkan di sini kira-kira sama dengan memerintahkan / order. U/ kata berupa, firasat saya adalah punya padanan yang lebih baik daripada kata-kata in the form of. Kalau bersua, akan saya sampaikan.

Berikut contoh perintah pemusnahan barang bukti.

SURJAYA ✸✸✸✸✸
http://www.tdcaa.com/node/4196
The weapon shall not be returned but ordered destroyed or forfeited to the state for law enforcement or county forensic lab use by the court entering the judgment...

http://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/05/12469/randa-kills-wiscon...
It is not clear when the last time was that a federal judge actually ordered that evidence in a criminal case be destroyed ...

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6439126-evidence-on-abuse-...
Canada, the TRC and the NCTR challenge the overall reasonableness of the Supervising Judge's order to destroy the IAP Documents.

Ada istilah Forms of Evidence dan Real Evidence yang masing-masing dapat diartikan sebagai Alat Bukti dan Barang Bukti. Walau ada perbedaan antara Common Law dan negatief wettelijk stelsel, dua istilah di atas tetap mewakili Alat Bukti dan Barang Bukti.

Dalam Common Law, Real Evidence adalah salah satu bagian dari Forms of Evidence, sementara dalam negatief wettelijk stelsel, Real Evidence bukan bagian dari Forms of Evidence.