English term
pulled
"Matthew stepped aside to get out of the way of a passing wagon that pulled a buff-colored bull to market."
Or is it some kind of humor?
Non-PRO (2): Cilian O'Tuama, Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
the bull is being pulled
agree |
Tony M
: Yes, also a possibility.
6 mins
|
agree |
Sheila Wilson
42 mins
|
agree |
Sarah Lewis-Morgan
: In this part of the world is is also quite common to put an animal in a sort of cage which is towed behind a vehicle while the animal walks.
2 hrs
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
2 hrs
|
agree |
Clauwolf
4 hrs
|
agree |
Britta Norris
20 hrs
|
neutral |
Yvonne Gallagher
: seems like a strange use of "pull" if the bull is trotting along behind a wagon? ON Nassau St NYC? Highly unlikely to have a bull like that in a city?
2 days 4 hrs
|
something (an ox / a draught horse) was pulling the cart containing the bull
Note that the more docile oxen are used for draught purposes; you would never use a bull for that!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 hrs (2020-11-27 08:08:36 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Asker, it definitely does NOT mean that 'the bull was pulling the waggon' — the EN syntax would be grammatically quite wrong for that.
The only doubt, due to the slightly odd expression used, is if the bull was IN the wggon or being pulled along behind it. I favour the former interpretation, simply because of the use of the verb 'to pull'; if the bull were merely being 'towed' behind the waggon, I wouldn't expect to use that verb, which to me somehow seems to suggest he was being dragged along — both unlikely and improbable!
agree |
Daryo
: I think this makes more sense.
13 hrs
|
Thanks, Daryo! I feel it is guided by the use of the verb 'to pull'... but it remains slightly ambiguous
|
|
agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: I agree that "pull" does not imply a bull being tethered to a wagon, but rather that it is IN the wagon being pulled in NYC!//surely "pull" is quite simply wrong verb with " bull"?mule & cart mentioned earlier//pull> haul= transport IN a cart or lorry
2 days 3 hrs
|
Thanks, Yvonne! I agree, although they were still driving cattle through the streets of Paris to Les Halles in... 1974!!! / Tend to agree with the odd use of 'pull', but cf. its quite common usage for 'haul', which with 'haulier' implies cart / Exactly!
|
Discussion
In the olden days, livestock were often 'driven' to market — hence a 'drover'
'Pulling' suggests more that they were led — so that could indeed be 'tethered to a moving cart'; or my own suggestion of 'conveyed in a cart drawn by some other animal'.
It would be nice, of course, to know what the cart was used for on the return journey (provisions, perhaps?) — it would seem silly to take an empty cart to market and back again just to lead a bull; but maybe they had other things to sell / buy?
https://novel122.com/mister-slaughter/part-one-the-monster03...
The only useful context is the year 1702 and Wall Street, New York.
What would have been the usual way to take a bull to the market in 1702 passing along the Wall street in New York?
There are some elements of black humour / irony in the rest of the text, but not in this quoted part.