Simple Past or Past Perfect

English translation: The first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", should be past perfect, the others should be past tense.

19:47 Feb 20, 2021
English language (monolingual) [PRO]
Art/Literary - Poetry & Literature
English term or phrase: Simple Past or Past Perfect
Which tense is more appropriate in the paragraph below? On one hand, John remembers the events that happened before a certain moment in the past, i.e. he first hit the vehicle and then remembered it and all the following events, which calls for Past Perfect. On the other hand, the sequence of events is clear, which means that Simple Past will work too. Any comments/suggestions? Thank you!

John looked at his car. The car wasn’t drivable. He remembered the moment he (had) hit the other vehicle very well. He remembered the blue sedan that (had) stopped abruptly in the middle of the road. There was (had been) no time to hit the brakes. His life (had) flashed before his eyes. His car (had) rear-ended the blue sedan and the airbags (had) deployed. John looked at the wrecked car again, shook his head and decided to walk home.
Talyb Samedov
Canada
Local time: 17:17
Selected answer:The first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", should be past perfect, the others should be past tense.
Explanation:
For the first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", there is a comparison of time sequence with the verb "remember" in the same sentence. The other verbs don't have. So, it should be:

John looked at his car. The car wasn’t drivable. He remembered the moment he had hit the other vehicle very well. He remembered the blue sedan that had stopped abruptly in the middle of the road. There was no time to hit the brakes. His life flashed before his eyes. His car rear-ended the blue sedan and the airbags deployed. John looked at the wrecked car again, shook his head and decided to walk home.
Selected response from:

Kiet Bach
United States
Local time: 16:17
Grading comment
I would like to thank everybody for their input/comments. Special thanks to Oliver Simões for the link to Jami Gold's site.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED
4 +3The first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", should be past perfect, the others should be past tense.
Kiet Bach
5 +1looked (simple past); remebered (sp); had hit (past perfect); remembered (sp); had stopped (pp); was
Mohammad Nazeeh
4 +1All in the simple past
Shilpa Baliga
4 +1mix of past simple + past perfect
Yvonne Gallagher


Discussion entries: 11





  

Answers


14 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +3
simple past or past perfect
The first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", should be past perfect, the others should be past tense.


Explanation:
For the first 2 verbs, "hit" and "stop", there is a comparison of time sequence with the verb "remember" in the same sentence. The other verbs don't have. So, it should be:

John looked at his car. The car wasn’t drivable. He remembered the moment he had hit the other vehicle very well. He remembered the blue sedan that had stopped abruptly in the middle of the road. There was no time to hit the brakes. His life flashed before his eyes. His car rear-ended the blue sedan and the airbags deployed. John looked at the wrecked car again, shook his head and decided to walk home.

Kiet Bach
United States
Local time: 16:17
Native speaker of: Native in ChineseChinese
PRO pts in category: 4
Grading comment
I would like to thank everybody for their input/comments. Special thanks to Oliver Simões for the link to Jami Gold's site.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Oliver Simões: Agreed. His recollections were past, linear events (hence, the simple past) except for "had hit" and "had stopped", which are clearly in relation to the act of remembering. https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/154647/past-tense-wh...
1 hr
  -> Thank you!

agree  Diego Cortez: I agree too, the two first verbs he remembers something that happened before that moment, and the following verbs are just thoughts. He is thinking about the accident but does not anymore telling what had happened.
1 hr
  -> Thank you!

disagree  Yvonne Gallagher: no, it's not a matter of "comparison of time sequence". It's a question of the sequence of tenses in English. You can't put only 2 of these in the PP as it's too inconsistent. And "should be past tense" is extremely vague. Which past tense?
1 hr

agree  Tina Vonhof (X)
22 hrs
  -> Thank you!

agree  Cilian O'Tuama: In a text like this, you could even omit all 'had's. Or maybe just include the first one. It won't be misunderstood.
1 day 6 hrs
  -> Thank you!

neutral  Helena Chavarria: Sorry, I don't agree with you.
3 days 18 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

51 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +1
All in the simple past


Explanation:
As you say, the sequence of events is very clear. I personally think using the simple past throughout would make the flashback more immediate and more powerful. The past perfect is somehow clumsier.

Shilpa Baliga
Local time: 01:17
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: English

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
neutral  Yvonne Gallagher: I actually disagree. Yes, in speech you could make a case for all verbs in the PS but grammatically speaking and in writing, that's incorrect. And don't know why you see PP as "clumsier"?
1 hr
  -> Of course I know that it's grammatically incorrect (as I'm sure the asker does). My argument is that this flashback works in a similar way to speech, where we do ofen omit it because too many "hads" are cacophonic and dare I say it, clumsy?

agree  Cilian O'Tuama: No need to complicate it.
1 day 5 hrs

neutral  Helena Chavarria: In UK/European English, all in past simple would be wrong.
3 days 17 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5 peer agreement (net): +1
simple past or past perfect
looked (simple past); remebered (sp); had hit (past perfect); remembered (sp); had stopped (pp); was


Explanation:
Dear Talyeb,

If the context is formal, e.g., academic, then all grammar rules and writing conventions are to be applied.

‘Past tense... denotes an act, state, or condition that occurred at some explicit or implicit point in the past.’ As for past-perfect tense (or pluperfect), ‘it refers to an act, state, or condition that was completed before another specified or implicit time past or past action.’ (Chicago Manual of Style, 2017)

Having that noted, the paragraph in a formal context would be as follows:

John looked at his car. The car wasn’t drivable. He remembered the moment he had hit the other vehicle very well. He remembered the blue sedan that had stopped abruptly in the middle of the road. There was no time to hit the brakes. His life flashed before his eyes. His car rear-ended the blue sedan, and the airbags deployed. John looked at the wrecked car again, shook his head and decided to walk home.

Of note, if the context is not formal, e.g., general, casual, creative, then some stylistic flexibility or some bending of rules and conventions can be entertained. In fact, native speakers often use simple past over pluperfect. You may use past simple though it might cause a little gasp of horror if read by a grammar stickler. :)

Mohammad Nazeeh
Palestine
Local time: 02:17
Works in field
Native speaker of: Arabic

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Cilian O'Tuama: IMO the context is not formal, so this approach works.
1 day 5 hrs

neutral  Helena Chavarria: I was taught to speak well wherever I am and in all situations. For example, I can remember my mother correcting me on one occasion when I said 'drawRer' (with an 'R' in the middle).
3 days 17 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +1
simple past or past perfect
mix of past simple + past perfect


Explanation:
as a teacher of EFL the actual order of tenses here should be
Past Simple (PS) for any simple/finished past action and Past perfect for any actions that take place BEFORE those past simple actions.

Thus:

looked wasn’t remembered PS

he had hit PP

He remembered (PS)...

had stopped...had been. ... had flashed.... had rear-ended ...had deployed. PP

John looked ...shook ... decided (PS)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2021-02-20 21:26:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

You think "the sequence of events is clear", but the sequence or order of tenses in formal writing is also clear and grammatically speaking, that calls for a mix of Past Simple and Past Perfect.
And nothing "clumsy" about the Past Perfect.

Yvonne Gallagher
Ireland
Local time: 00:17
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 317

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Petrus Maritz
22 mins
  -> Many thanks:-)

disagree  Oliver Simões: If you apply prescriptive grammar, yes, but writing (especially creative writing) goes beyond what the grammar books tell us. No one deserves to read a paragraph with too many "hads". Check out Jami Gold's take on the subject.
1 hr
  -> You are agreeing with a wrong answer and disagreeing with this (right) one? And it took you 8 edits to write this comment yet think you can lecture me on English?

agree  Tony M
1 hr
  -> Thanks Tony!

neutral  Diego Cortez: if he is just thinking in an action that happened before another but he had not realized at the moment, in this example: he is supposing that he had had any time to hit the break, but actually, he had had. It is just a supposition, should I use PP or PS?
1 hr
  -> I don't understand your question?

disagree  Cilian O'Tuama: Your "As a teacher, the order should be..." implies the order is a teacher. // Sorry for rambling. //You obv. want a disagree
7 hrs
  -> Your comprehension is even worse than your Denglish. I seem to have rattled your cage in some way. Piece of work!

agree  Arabic & More
9 hrs
  -> Many thanks:-)

agree  Helena Chavarria: This is the best answer. As you point out, in most cases, 'had' would be pronounced either 'd' or 'əd'.
3 days 17 hrs
  -> Thank you Helena for your confirmation :-)

disagree  Kiet Bach: Respectfully disagree. Imagine the author keeps on writing: "The ambulance had come. The police had also come and had made a report. The other driver had been taken to the hospital, .....". Really?
5 days
  -> Disrespectful! A tit-for-tat disagree and ciompletely unwarranted. Why imagine? Why not stick to ST (ends with Past Simple "he looked [...] walked away instead of hypothesising??
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search