This question was closed without grading. Reason: No acceptable answer
Nov 28, 2008 15:37
15 yrs ago
1 viewer *
German term
Beweistransfer
German to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
evidence
U.S. Supreme Court zum Konfrontationsrecht: Ohne Mitwirkung der Verteidigung kein Beweistransfer - also ein Meilenstein für die Beschuldigtenrechte?
This term is used a number of times in a law review article with the above title (see http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/04-09/index.php3?sei... The article analyzes US Supreme Court case (see http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/ussc/02/02-9410.php?referer... In that context, it appears to refer to the admission of ex parte testimony, but I can find nothing definitive in any legal reference materials. Is anyone familiar with the term?
This term is used a number of times in a law review article with the above title (see http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/04-09/index.php3?sei... The article analyzes US Supreme Court case (see http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/ussc/02/02-9410.php?referer... In that context, it appears to refer to the admission of ex parte testimony, but I can find nothing definitive in any legal reference materials. Is anyone familiar with the term?
Proposed translations
(English)
4 | cross-admissibility (internationally; US: interstate) of evidence | Adrian MM. (X) |
3 | evidence transference | Vittorio Ferretti |
References
transfer of evidence | Paul Skidmore |
Proposed translations
34 mins
evidence transference
wörtliche Übersetzung, kenne mich im Prozessrecht aber nicht aus;
siehe das Fallbespiel im Zusammenhang mit dem Simpson-Prozess
siehe das Fallbespiel im Zusammenhang mit dem Simpson-Prozess
Reference:
http://archive.capecodonline.com/cctimes/edits/cctblogs/el/archives/2006/10/grilling_of_jan.htm
5 hrs
cross-admissibility (internationally; US: interstate) of evidence
Cross-admissible is a stretchable concept: from defendant to defendant; case-to-case; state to state; or country to country.
The fact that it is ex parte testimony is secondary to the overarching admissibility issue.
The fact that it is ex parte testimony is secondary to the overarching admissibility issue.
Example sentence:
Under the court\\\'s rule, the first issue raised by a motion to sever is cross- admissibility: Whether evidence admissible to one case would also be admissible ...
Reference comments
42 mins
Reference:
transfer of evidence
in the book synopsis mentioned below "Beweistransfer" is mentioned. From the context it would seem to address the question of when evidence obtained in one context or legal system can be admitted as evidence in another.
In your case, as you say, it appears to relate to ex parte testimony which cannot be tested by cross-examination
In your case, as you say, it appears to relate to ex parte testimony which cannot be tested by cross-examination
Reference:
Discussion
Using anything like 'transfer' in the context of evidence could be misleading to a UK reader and suggest the physical transfer of a piece of evidence, or transfer from one country to another, like under this proposed European Evidence Warrant. I don't think transfer is used in the context of admissibility of evidence. See this CPS legal guidance on hearsay http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/hearsay/#a08 - using the find function of Firefox only got me one mention of the word transfer and this was in notice of transfer or service of case, nothing with 'transfer of evidence'.