This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
The used construction is not a verb itself. It is an indication of continuous action in the past which qualifies a verb - a past continuous form as opposed to present continuous.
Eg
Did you hit the dog? A one off event in the past.
Used you to hit the dog? A continuous action in the past.
Yes I hit the dog. Confirmation of one off past event.
Yes I used to hit the dog. Confirmation of continuous past actions.
No I did not / didn't hit the dog. Negative statement of one off past action.
No I used not / usen't to hit the dog. Negative statement of past continuous action.
"Did use to hit / did not use to hit / didn't use to hit" are IMO (and more importantly in my mother's opinion) extremely NON-U and are another unpleasant reduction in standards of English.
The "did" construction is also very non-euphonic.
"Used you to hit the dog?" is not correct English. At least it is not used by educated English speakers.
"No, I usen't to hit the dog" is not correct English either.
Here's a random link that discusses the latter ...
Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio
Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business.
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value